Posts Tagged ‘trademark’

Trademark Issues for Papal Conclave?

Wednesday, March 13th, 2013

Even a Pope has trademark issues.  The Vatican owns trademarks, while there are rumors that the Pope Emeritus himself may be put to the test of trademark infringement.

 

Bob Marley’s Family Settles Trademark Suit

Tuesday, December 4th, 2012

Fort Lauderdale attorney Michael I. Santucci recently helped family members of Bob Marley settle a federal lawsuit regarding intellectual property rights relating to the reggae music legend, his mother Cedella Marley Booker and Miami’s Nine Mile Music Festival.

How To Protect Your Business From Copycats

Monday, November 26th, 2012

Formal intellectual property rights are only as good as your ability to enforce them against infringers.

The Consequences of Using the Trademark Registration Symbol ® If Your Mark is Not Registered (Reprise)

Friday, February 10th, 2012

We posted a quick guide to risks involved in improperly using a Trademark Registration Symbol (®) a few years back, and want to make sure our new readers are just as well informed.

Some businesses will improperly use the trademark registered symbol for a wide range of reasons. Most often, they’re merely mistaken, or innocently using the symbol improperly. But to do so deliberately is fraud. As per Section 906.02 of the Trademark Manual of Examining Procedure:

“Improper use of the federal registration symbol that is deliberate and intended to deceive or mislead the public is fraud. See TMEP §906.04. However, misunderstandings about use of federal registration symbols are more frequent than occurrences of actual fraudulent intent.”

Some of the most common reasons for improper use that do not indicate fraud are:

  • Confusion between application of trademark and copyright notices. For copyrights the © should be applied before publication.
    • For trademarks many people mistakenly begin applying ® to their product while their trademark is still only an application. A trademark must be fully registered by the USPTO before ® can be used.
  • Mistaken belief that registration in foreign country applies in United States, as well.
  • Registration for only a portion of the mark
  • Registering the mark for other goods

The USPTO prefers not to penalize persons who unintentionally apply the registration symbol incorrectly, but the USPTO is well within its right to do so. If the USPTO were to pursue a person who incorrectly applies a registration symbol, that person would have to prove their innocence and unintentional fraud. One may be found guilty of fraud, unclean hands, or suffer denial of registration.

If the USPTO decides that fraud was committed deliberately, a trademark applicant’s request for relief may be barred under the doctrine of ‘unclean hands’ and evidence of intentional misuse may be used to deny a trademark registration.

Do not allow yourself to be penalized for unintentionally committing fraud. Always speak to an attorney when filing for a trademark registration, or when considering doing so. If not, you may place your brand, or company at serious risk.

Facebook Plans to Trademark the Word ‘Face’

Wednesday, November 24th, 2010

The social-networking giant was just given a green light in its efforts to trademark the word “face.” The company’s efforts have moved Facebook’s pursuit of face past the opposition period, according to the U.S Patent and Trademark Office, and a Notice of Allowance has been issued.

Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/scitech/2010/11/24/facebook-plans-trademark-word-face/#ixzz16FqrTA3u

High schools need to phase out Gator logos

Friday, September 24th, 2010

The University of Florida’s licensing company, Collegiate Licensing Company, has sent out cease-and-desist letters to schools that have been using its logo.

Schools using the Florida State University Seminole logo have also been asked to change their symbol, said UF spokeswoman Janine Sikes.

“It’s not a UF or an FSU problem,” Sikes said. “It’s a nationwide issue of how do we deal with competing licensing agreements. And legally, the university has an obligation to protect its trademarks.”

Sikes said the issue that got CLC’s attention was the sale of Gator-branded merchandise.

Supreme Court Holds NFL to be “32 Separate Teams”

Tuesday, May 25th, 2010

The Supreme Court recently reversed a lower court’s holding that previously threw out a suit against the NFL for antitrust violations.  The Supreme Court, going against the NFL, held that the NFL is not entitled to broad antitrust protection as one company, and instead will be considered as 32 separate teams when selling branding items, such as apparel and memorabilia.

The case, American Needle v. NFL, 08-661, began when American Needle, a company that made NFL headgear, lost business when the NFL awarded an exclusive contract to Reebok.  Justice Stevens, writing for a unanimous Court, is quoted as stating: “Although NFL teams have common interests such as promoting the NFL brand, they are still separate, profit-maximizing entities, and their interests in licensing team trademarks are not necessarily aligned.”

Major League Baseball (MLB) is currently the only professional sports league with broad antitrust protection.

Subway Taking Action on “Footlong” Trademark

Tuesday, May 18th, 2010

We’ve all seen the commercials featuring Subway’s catchy tune “$5 Footlong.” Subway is taking the fame they received from this new marketing scheme, however, and attempting to turn it into a trademark monopoly.  It has been reported recently that Subway is taking action by sending cease & desist letters to various food establishments, demanding them to stop using “footlong” in reference to sandwiches.

The nature of Subway’s trademark seems to be merely “descriptive,” and may be prohibited.  The Patent and Trademark Office is now considering the trademark. See a copy of the cease and desist letter here.

Jay-Z and David Ortiz in Trademark Dispute

Friday, April 16th, 2010

The well-known hip-hop artist, business mogul and rapper Jay-Z recently sued Red Sox player David Ortiz for trademark infringement. Ortiz recently opened a Dominican club in Santo Domingo bearing the name ”Forty-Forty,” prompting Jay-Z to file suit in New York on Thursday.

Reports state that Jay-Z alleges Ortiz is infringing on his  trademark and attempting to capitalize on Jay-Z’s fame and good fortune by using the same name of Jay-Z’s chain of nightclubs around the country bearing the name “40/40.”

Ortiz contends that the Forty-Forty name has nothing to do with Jay-Z, and instead refers to the feat of hitting 40 homers and stealing 40 bases in one season. Jay-Z currently owns 40/40 nightclubs in Manhattan, Las Vegas and Atlantic City. Evidence shows that Ortiz has visited at least one of Jay-Z’s 40/40 nightclubs in the past.

Lucasfilm Fights Trademark Infringement

Tuesday, February 9th, 2010

The company that produced the “Star Wars” films is suing a Chicago billboard company in federal court for using the term “Skywalker” on billboards and on its Website.

Despite protests by Lucasfilm Ltd., Skywalker Outdoor Inc. has been using the Skywalker terminology, confusing fans and profiting from a term that has been trademarked since 1977, according to the lawsuit.