Posts Tagged ‘internet’

Supreme Court OKs $222K Verdict for Sharing 24 Songs

Monday, March 18th, 2013

The Supreme Court on Monday let stand a jury’s conclusion that Jammie Thomas-Rasset pay the recording industry $222,000 for downloading and sharing two dozen copyrighted songs on the now-defunct file-sharing service Kazaa.  Without comment, the justices declined (.pdf) to review a petition from the Minnesota woman who claimed the damages award was unconstitutionally excessive and was not rationally related to the harm she caused the music labels.

 

Facebook Plans to Trademark the Word ‘Face’

Wednesday, November 24th, 2010

The social-networking giant was just given a green light in its efforts to trademark the word “face.” The company’s efforts have moved Facebook’s pursuit of face past the opposition period, according to the U.S Patent and Trademark Office, and a Notice of Allowance has been issued.

Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/scitech/2010/11/24/facebook-plans-trademark-word-face/#ixzz16FqrTA3u

Woman Sues Google Maps After Getting Hit by Car

Thursday, June 3rd, 2010

A California woman is suing Google for negligence after following their map suggestions and was hit and injured by a car on a major Utah highway. The woman, while in Park City, Utah, is reported to have used the walking directions from Google Maps on her Blackberry, which led her onto a busy highway with no shoulder or sidewalk.  Google issues warnings about possibly dangerous routes that are visible on a PC, but may not be visible on cell phones, reports say. See the Complaint against the driver and Google  here.

Psystar, a Rebel South Florida Company, Takes On Apple

Tuesday, November 24th, 2009

Psystar, a Rebel South Florida Company, Takes On Apple

China Rules Microsoft Violated Intellectual Property Rights

Monday, November 23rd, 2009

China Rules Microsoft Violated Intellectual Property Rights

Judge Blocks BlueBeat Beatles MP3s

Friday, November 6th, 2009

Judge Blocks BlueBeat Beatles MP3s

10 Ways To Avoid Being Sued On Twitter

Wednesday, October 7th, 2009

10 basic ways to avoid being sued on Twitter…

Payola: Should Internet Radio Stations Be Able to Accept Pay for Play While Over-the-Air Stations are Statutorily Precluded?

Monday, August 10th, 2009

Summer Associate Jennifer Swirsky’s recent article placed in the Top 15 in this year’s GRAMMY Foundation® Entertainment Law Initiative (ELI) Writing Contest. In its eleventh year, ELI is designed to forge a connection between the Recording Academy’s creative and technical constituency and the legal community. ELI promotes discussion and debate on the most compelling legal issues facing the music industry today. Jennifer contacted the Entertainment and Sports Law Section of The Florida Bar about publishing her article.  They have posted an edited version on the main page of their website.

The Internet and You

Thursday, July 30th, 2009

The next stage of development of the internet is going to turn intellectual property law on its ear.  The essence of the internet is the transmission of ideas and expression on an individual level.  The essence of intellectual property law is the protection of an individual’s ideas and expression.  When viewed from this perspective, it is easy to see where those two worlds will collide.

Intellectual property law focuses on the protection of (1) trade secrets, (2) copyrights, (3) trademarks (or trade manes or trade dress), and (4) patents.  Each subdivision of intellectual property law has its own elements, rules, and methodology.  For instance trade secrets are ideas that derive value from their very secrecy.  Copyrights, on the other hand, are the expression of an idea, which derives value from the uniqueness of that expression.  There is one unique element which is common to each division of intellectual property: access to the information and expression.

Traditionally in an intellectual property lawsuit much of the efforts and attorneys fees are generated by attempting to prove that the alleged infringer or user of the intellectual property had access to the underlying idea, information or expression.  The massive proliferation of ideas, information and expressions by individual internet users almost rendered that element moot.  Potential infringers now have access to an unlimited amount of ideas, information, and expression of ideas simply by turning on the computer.

One would think that it would be much easier to initiate a lawsuit if another has taken and used intellectual property.  There is an old adage which is strangely appropriate: God giveth with one hand, and taketh with the other.  Translation: while the proliferation of information, ideas, and expression appears to solve the element of access, it makes another problematic.  It is a basic tenet of intellectual property law that once something is in the public domain (and unprotected) then others are able to use and practice that idea or expression.

The question becomes, how to enjoy the benefits of expressing ideas and expression on the internet, without the potential pitfalls of having another find it and use or practice it?  The answer: register you intellectual property through the Copyright Act, the Lanham Act (trademarks), and the Patent Act before you expose it to the public.

What is the next phase of development on the internet?  Very soon individuals will be able to broadcast their version of movie, television shows, reality programming, etc. without having to turn to the production departments of studios of television channels.  It will be massive instance access to a limitless amount of programming.  The advent of technology allows everybody to film and edit with a videocam, and publish it to computers and even cell phones.  What is to prevent a studio or television network from taking those ideas or expressions and turning it into their own programming?  Nothing!

The only answer is to protect your intellectual property before it is placed into the public domain on the internet.  Call us today for a FREE consultation.